Happiest and Least Happy MOTIVES Personality Types
MOTIVES personality-type combinations ranked by average Vitality score in a sample of approximately 767,000 test takers.
The original analysis ranks thousands of seven-position MOTIVES type codes from highest to lowest Vitality. The strongest pattern is unsurprising but important: types explicitly classified as Vital dominate the top of the ranking, while Depressive types dominate the bottom.
More interestingly, the ranking also suggests that the other six personality dimensions modify the level of Vitality within each broad Vitality band. Low Materialism (Ascetic), high Offbeat, and high Thinking appear especially often near the very top even though the source page notes that these traits have little overall zero-order correlation with Vitality across all test takers.
Five Useful Reference Points
n = 1,367
n = 113
n = 1,736
n = 204
n = 3,882
What the Type Codes Mean
Each position represents one MOTIVES dimension. X means the person falls in the middle range on that dimension.
M / A / X — Materialistic / Ascetic / middleO / C / X — Offbeat / Conventional / middleI / W / X — Interpersonal / Withholding / middleV / D / X — Vital / Depressive / middleS / G / X — Sectarian / Globalistic / middle
Example: AOTIVEG = Ascetic, Offbeat, Thinking, Interpersonal, Vital,
Easygoing, Globalistic. It is the highest-ranked combination in the current dataset.
Personality Definition and Vitality
One of the most interesting observations on the original page is the contrast between
XXXXVXX, XXXXXXX, and XXXXDXX. The all-middle high-Vitality type
scores below many more strongly defined high-Vitality types. The all-middle low-Vitality type, meanwhile,
is less unhappy than many more strongly defined low-Vitality combinations.
That pattern is consistent with the idea that a more strongly differentiated personality can amplify an existing Vitality direction: people who are already high in Vitality may benefit from particular strong trait combinations, while people who are low in Vitality may show still lower scores when other traits are also strongly expressed. This is an observational pattern, not proof that having a more defined personality causes greater happiness or unhappiness.
Highest- and Lowest-Ranked Types
The original page contains more than two thousand ranked combinations. To make the redesign usable, the tables below preserve the highest and lowest portions of the ranking—the sections where the personality patterns are easiest to interpret—rather than forcing readers through the entire raw list.
| Type | Vitality | n |
|---|---|---|
| AOTIVEG | 23.9605 | 1,367 |
| AOTWVEG | 23.8586 | 573 |
| AOTIVES | 23.7222 | 1,141 |
| AXTXVEG | 23.6023 | 342 |
| AOTXVEG | 23.5547 | 512 |
| XCXWVXG | 23.5435 | 92 |
| AOTIVRX | 23.5197 | 254 |
| XOTIVRS | 23.5067 | 223 |
| AOTIVRS | 23.4473 | 389 |
| AOTWVXG | 23.4212 | 273 |
| XOTWVEG | 23.4190 | 210 |
| AOTXVRS | 23.3891 | 239 |
| ACTIVES | 23.2773 | 768 |
| AOTXVEX | 23.2700 | 300 |
| AOTIVEX | 23.2514 | 720 |
| XOTIVRG | 23.2359 | 301 |
| MOTIVEG | 23.2336 | 1,173 |
| AOTWVES | 23.2298 | 692 |
| AOTXVES | 23.1871 | 449 |
| AOTIVRG | 23.1574 | 540 |
| MOTIVRX | 23.1545 | 343 |
| ACXIVXS | 23.1429 | 105 |
| AOTXVXG | 23.1333 | 225 |
| MOTWVEG | 23.1317 | 486 |
| AOXIVXS | 23.1308 | 107 |
| XOTXVEG | 23.1188 | 261 |
| AXTIVES | 23.1176 | 459 |
| AOXXVXG | 23.0848 | 165 |
| ACTXVEG | 23.0750 | 440 |
| XCTIVES | 23.0560 | 339 |
| MOTXVEG | 23.0559 | 447 |
| MXTXVEG | 23.0553 | 217 |
| ACTWVRG | 23.0437 | 663 |
| AOXIVEG | 23.0435 | 620 |
| AXTWVEX | 23.0303 | 132 |
| AXTIVXS | 23.0283 | 212 |
| ACXIVRS | 23.0175 | 114 |
| ACXXVRS | 23.0111 | 90 |
| XOTIVES | 23.0111 | 814 |
| AOTWVEX | 23.0066 | 305 |
| XOTIVXS | 22.9956 | 228 |
| MOTWVXG | 22.9906 | 213 |
| ACTWVEG | 22.9812 | 478 |
| AOHIVEG | 22.9686 | 1,210 |
| AOTIVXS | 22.9666 | 329 |
| XOHIVRS | 22.9589 | 73 |
| ACTIVEG | 22.9581 | 1,218 |
| AOHWVEG | 22.9569 | 1,161 |
| MXTWVEG | 22.9553 | 179 |
| XOTIVEG | 22.9542 | 589 |
| AXTIVEG | 22.9405 | 740 |
| AXTXVES | 22.9390 | 246 |
| ACTWVEX | 22.9328 | 238 |
| XOTWVRS | 22.9274 | 303 |
| ACTIVEX | 22.9181 | 598 |
| XOTXVES | 22.9100 | 311 |
| AOTIVXG | 22.9091 | 495 |
| XOTWVEX | 22.8889 | 144 |
| AOTXVRG | 22.8827 | 307 |
| AOXIVRG | 22.8793 | 232 |
| AOHWVRG | 22.8756 | 667 |
| AOTWVRG | 22.8734 | 466 |
| ACTWVRX | 22.8622 | 283 |
| AOTXVRX | 22.8608 | 158 |
| ACXWVRS | 22.8529 | 272 |
| MOTXVES | 22.8511 | 833 |
| ACTWVES | 22.8416 | 461 |
| XOTXVRS | 22.8353 | 170 |
| ACXWVES | 22.8300 | 200 |
| AXTIVEX | 22.8234 | 368 |
| AXTIVXG | 22.8182 | 352 |
| MXTIVRX | 22.8150 | 200 |
| AXTIVRS | 22.8109 | 238 |
| MOTIVES | 22.8107 | 1,928 |
| XXTXVRS | 22.8077 | 104 |
| ACTWVXG | 22.8028 | 289 |
| MCTWVEX | 22.7972 | 143 |
| MOTWVES | 22.7936 | 1,129 |
| ACXXVRG | 22.7887 | 284 |
| AOTWVRX | 22.7850 | 214 |
| Type | Vitality | n |
|---|---|---|
| AOHWDRG | 5.6175 | 2,557 |
| MXTIDRG | 5.5970 | 1,315 |
| MXHWDRG | 5.5935 | 2,236 |
| MCHWDEX | 5.5902 | 1,081 |
| MXHXDRG | 5.5844 | 1,273 |
| XCHIDEG | 5.5782 | 1,304 |
| ACXIDRG | 5.5677 | 1,395 |
| ACHIDES | 5.5673 | 1,248 |
| ACXIDRX | 5.5667 | 427 |
| XXHIDRS | 5.5622 | 217 |
| ACTIDRS | 5.5589 | 1,426 |
| XCHXDRS | 5.5464 | 388 |
| MXHXDRS | 5.5431 | 591 |
| MCTIDRX | 5.5428 | 1,542 |
| XOHIDRX | 5.5364 | 412 |
| MXHIDES | 5.5361 | 1,080 |
| MOHXDRS | 5.5308 | 1,121 |
| ACHXDRG | 5.5081 | 2,283 |
| XCHIDXX | 5.5044 | 341 |
| ACHIDEG | 5.4991 | 3,244 |
| ACHIDXG | 5.4867 | 1,841 |
| MOHIDES | 5.4770 | 2,562 |
| MOHXDRG | 5.4640 | 2,056 |
| MCXIDRX | 5.4575 | 518 |
| XXHIDXX | 5.4471 | 331 |
| MCTIDRG | 5.4287 | 3,406 |
| XCHIDXS | 5.4247 | 259 |
| XCXIDRX | 5.4241 | 290 |
| MXXIDRG | 5.3710 | 787 |
| MOHIDXG | 5.3550 | 2,065 |
| MXHIDEG | 5.3517 | 1,635 |
| MCHXDRX | 5.3432 | 912 |
| AXHIDRG | 5.3378 | 1,353 |
| AXHIDRS | 5.3377 | 382 |
| ACXIDRS | 5.3282 | 451 |
| ACHWDRS | 5.3216 | 2,186 |
| MCXIDRS | 5.2793 | 623 |
| AOHIDRG | 5.2733 | 1,870 |
| MCHWDRX | 5.2645 | 2,023 |
| XXHIDRX | 5.2637 | 273 |
| MXHIDXG | 5.2464 | 1,112 |
| XOHIDRS | 5.2328 | 408 |
| MOHIDXS | 5.2204 | 1,166 |
| MCHIDES | 5.1970 | 1,249 |
| MCHIDXX | 5.1710 | 772 |
| MCHWDRG | 5.1632 | 4,456 |
| MOXIDRG | 5.1567 | 1,117 |
| ACXIDXX | 5.1535 | 430 |
| MOHIDXX | 5.1395 | 982 |
| XCHIDXG | 5.1103 | 789 |
| MCHXDRG | 5.1090 | 2,184 |
| MCHIDEX | 5.1013 | 1,027 |
| MCHWDRS | 5.0917 | 3,118 |
| AOHIDRX | 5.0887 | 575 |
| XXHIDRG | 5.0875 | 834 |
| XOHIDRG | 5.0814 | 1,179 |
| AXHIDRX | 5.0547 | 457 |
| MCHIDEG | 5.0185 | 2,373 |
| MCXIDRG | 5.0098 | 1,321 |
| MOTIDES | 5.0069 | 5,469 |
| MCHXDRS | 4.9403 | 988 |
| MCHIDXS | 4.9169 | 758 |
| ACHIDRS | 4.9157 | 1,068 |
| XCHIDRS | 4.8237 | 448 |
| MCHIDXG | 4.7970 | 1,709 |
| XCHIDRX | 4.7964 | 560 |
| ACHIDRX | 4.6523 | 1,113 |
| ACHIDRG | 4.6427 | 3,929 |
| MXHIDRS | 4.6389 | 792 |
| AOHIDRS | 4.6340 | 735 |
| MOHIDRG | 4.6123 | 3,931 |
| MOHIDRS | 4.5923 | 1,734 |
| MXHIDRG | 4.5910 | 2,032 |
| XCHIDRG | 4.5559 | 1,727 |
| MOHIDRX | 4.4676 | 1,405 |
| MXHIDRX | 4.3280 | 808 |
| MCHIDRX | 4.2570 | 1,288 |
| MCHIDRS | 4.2303 | 1,346 |
| MCHIDRG | 4.0665 | 3,882 |
What Stands Out Near the Top
The highest-ranked type is AOTIVEG. Many of the leading types begin with A
rather than M, contain O rather than C, and contain
T rather than H. In the MOTIVES vocabulary, that means Ascetic,
Offbeat, and Thinking orientations are unusually common among the happiest combinations in this ranking.
That does not mean those traits independently cause happiness. The source page specifically notes that their overall correlation with Vitality can be close to zero. Their appearance near the top may instead reflect interactions: particular traits may relate differently to Vitality depending on the rest of the personality profile.
How to Interpret the Ranking
Vitality is itself one of the seven MOTIVES dimensions, so this ranking should not be read as an independent external validation of the type system. A type with V in the fifth position is partly defined by high Vitality, and a type with D is partly defined by low Vitality. The more informative question is how the other six dimensions shift the average score within those broad bands.
Type sample sizes also vary substantially. Very small type groups will have less stable averages than large ones. The ranking is therefore most useful for identifying broad patterns and candidate interactions, not for treating tiny differences between adjacent codes as meaningful.